| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go? |
| Date: | 2006-05-31 16:56:52 |
| Message-ID: | 447DCAD4.7010805@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
>
> When we were trying to do DW stuff on Linux + Opteron + FibreChannel +
> EMC DiskArray, we too frequently found filesystems keeling over. It
> was neither cheap nor reliable.
When is When? Not trying to start a flame war but I am curious as to
your specifications to make this stuff work. Was it kernel 2.4 or 2.6?
It 2.6, which? What filesystem are we talking about?
Are we talking the last 12 months? Or earlier then that?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John DeSoi | 2006-05-31 17:24:18 | Re: The best way connecting. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-31 16:20:42 | Re: PGSQL 7.4 -> 8.1 migration & performance problem |