Re: Best high availability solution ?

From: Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>
To: Arnaud Lesauvage <thewild(at)freesurf(dot)fr>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Best high availability solution ?
Date: 2006-05-31 10:50:32
Message-ID: 447D74F8.4080601@wildenhain.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Arnaud Lesauvage schrieb:
> Tino Wildenhain a écrit :
>
>> pg_dump does not require you to stop the master database anyway.
>> (in fact it cannot even dump a stopped database :-)
>
>
> Hello Tino,
>
> I think I might just use this pg_dump solution...
> Seems to be quite simple to set up.

personally I think the WAL approach is by far easier
to set up and maintain - the pg_dump is in fact easy,
but the restore to another database can be tricky
if you want it unattended and bullit-proof the same
time.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Arnaud Lesauvage 2006-05-31 10:53:21 Re: Best high availability solution ?
Previous Message Dave Page 2006-05-31 10:46:05 Re: Best high availability solution ?