Re: [HACKERS] BEGIN inside transaction should be an error

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] BEGIN inside transaction should be an error
Date: 2006-05-26 15:45:40
Message-ID: 447722A4.9000901@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches


Please read the developers FAQ:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.FAQ_DEV.html

For the most part, patches are probably best generated relative to the
root directory of your CVS checkout.

cheers

andrew

Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> I have made the changes to implement this TODO item. I wish to
> know the standard procedure (command) to generate a patch; and from
> which level in the source directory should I execute it?
>
> On 5/18/06, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>
>> Added to TODO:
>>
>> * Add a GUC to control whether BEGIN inside a transcation
>> should abort
>> the transaction.
>>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2006-05-26 15:55:19 Re: Inefficient bytea escaping?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-05-26 15:42:29 Re: [HACKERS] BEGIN inside transaction should be an error

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gurjeet Singh 2006-05-26 16:00:22 Re: [HACKERS] BEGIN inside transaction should be an error
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-05-26 15:42:29 Re: [HACKERS] BEGIN inside transaction should be an error