| From: | Alban Hertroys <alban(at)magproductions(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jorge Godoy <jgodoy(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [SQL] (Ab)Using schemas and inheritance |
| Date: | 2006-05-24 09:09:38 |
| Message-ID: | 447422D2.4060403@magproductions.nl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-sql |
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Moving to -general, where it's more likely that others will have input.
> Perhaps the biggest issue is: what happens when you need to do DDL? If
> you have 1000 schemas that should be identical, you'll need to perform
> any DDL 1000 times.
What about using updatable views instead of inheritence? You'd need your
company_id back, but adding new companies or modifying table definitions
could be a lot easier (as long as you don't need to update all of your
views...).
--
Alban Hertroys
alban(at)magproductions(dot)nl
magproductions b.v.
T: ++31(0)534346874
F: ++31(0)534346876
M:
I: www.magproductions.nl
A: Postbus 416
7500 AK Enschede
// Integrate Your World //
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Csaba Nagy | 2006-05-24 10:29:12 | Re: allow LIMIT in UPDATE and DELETE |
| Previous Message | Alban Hertroys | 2006-05-24 08:52:20 | Re: challenging constraint situation - how do I make it |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | andi | 2006-05-24 10:35:10 | PLEASE help ME , HOW TO GENERATE PRIMARY Keys on the fly |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-24 03:08:58 | Re: [SQL] (Ab)Using schemas and inheritance |