| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Lukas Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
| Date: | 2006-05-20 16:55:23 |
| Message-ID: | 446F49FB.3090905@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
>
> Then again PGfoundry is great to keep development centered, but
> finding and building a new package is not really a one-liner, and
> if you're unlucky you might get alpha-quality code installed. :)
>
Mammoth PostgreSQL was designed to fill this role. It is an FOSS project
(www.mammothpostgresql.org) that is designed to be a COMPLETE postgresql
distribution.
Joshua D. Drake
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Woodward | 2006-05-20 17:58:56 | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-05-20 15:34:26 | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Woodward | 2006-05-20 17:58:56 | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-05-20 15:34:26 | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |