From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, John DeSoi <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
Date: | 2006-05-18 19:17:24 |
Message-ID: | 446CC844.70705@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
>
> While I do agree with the ideal, the reality may not be good enough. Even
> I, a PostgreSQL user for a decade, have to use MySQL right now because
> that is what the client uses.
Then you aren't choosing your clients wisely. :)
I am not trying to be rude, but if you don't want to use MySQL, don't.
We don't and we are testament to the fact that it is indeed possible to
make a living off of JUST PostgreSQL.
The only time we touch a different database is to MIGRATE from that
database.
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-05-18 19:22:42 | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
Previous Message | Mark Woodward | 2006-05-18 19:11:09 | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-05-18 19:18:12 | Re: [GENERAL] Querying libpq compile time options |
Previous Message | Mark Woodward | 2006-05-18 19:11:09 | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |