Re: IMMUTABLE?

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chris(dot)kings-lynne(at)calorieking(dot)com>
To: David Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: IMMUTABLE?
Date: 2006-05-17 01:29:13
Message-ID: 446A7C69.5030905@calorieking.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

> Yes, but there are definitely programming cases where
> memoization/caching definitely helps. And it's easy to tell for a given
> function whether or not it really helps by simply trying it with CACHED
> and without.
>
> Would this be a simple thing to implement?

It's called a "table" :)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Wheeler 2006-05-17 02:08:51 Re: IMMUTABLE?
Previous Message Jonathan Blitz 2006-05-17 01:19:26 Adding and filling new column on big table