Hi,
Tom Lane schrieb:
> Yes, and I'm sure it did. The more relevant question is how much data
> do you have in the child table? The planner generally won't bother with
> an indexscan if the table is only one or two disk pages; trying to use
> the index in such cases would end up fetching *more* disk pages overall.
>
Yes, there isn't much data in those child tables. It seems like this is
the reason why. Thanks for this information!
Regards,
Verena