Re: pg_stat_reset() weirdness

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_stat_reset() weirdness
Date: 2002-08-09 13:50:13
Message-ID: 446.1028901013@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> If you apply the pg_stat_reset() function patch you get this regression
> failure. Is this because it's returning a bool I guess? Shall I just fix
> the regression test to exclude this function?

No, you should fix the function definition. The sanity checks are there
for a reason.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-08-09 14:33:22 Re: CREATE TEMP TABLE .... ON COMMIT
Previous Message Daniel Lyons 2002-08-09 10:57:16 OOP real life example (was Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?