Re: [BUGS] BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64

Hi Bruce,

The new SPARC assembly file src/backend/port/tas/solaris_sparc.s uses /
instead of ! for comments, and as a result the compile fails with Sun
Studio 11. Please modify the first 3 lines to look like the following.

> !=======================================================================
> ! solaris_sparc.s -- compare and swap for solaris_sparc
> !=======================================================================

Thanks!

-Robert

Bruce Momjian wrote On 04/29/06 17:16,:

>Tom Lane wrote:
>
>
>>Theo Schlossnagle <jesus(at)omniti(dot)com> writes:
>>
>>
>>>I'd remind everyone that the spinlock stuff is entirely optional at
>>>build time.
>>>
>>>
>>Not really. The performance hit for not having hardware spinlocks is
>>so severe that it's not considered a reasonable fallback.
>>
>>
>>
>>>I also think it immensely useful to replace all of the tas subsystem
>>>with cas so that one could reliabily lock these atomics with the process
>>>id of the locker.
>>>
>>>
>>I cannot, ever once in my years working on Postgres, remember having
>>wanted such a thing. I am strongly against mucking with the spinlock
>>code for mere aesthetics --- it's too fragile and hard to test,
>>especially on platforms you don't have ready access to.
>>
>>In short, it ain't broken and we don't need to fix it.
>>
>>
>
>Agreed. Should the new Solaris ASM code be modified?
>
>
>