Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Try 3.

From: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chris(dot)kings-lynne(at)calorieking(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GIN - Generalized Inverted iNdex. Try 3.
Date: 2006-04-28 16:11:26
Message-ID: 44523EAE.7000005@sigaev.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> "Takes clustering into account" means nothing. We don't need that. Any
> such consideration would be handled by the AM-specific amcostestimate
> function.

Ok, I see. Sorry for misunderstanding. I thought that planner use that.

--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-04-28 17:09:16 pgsql: Modify Solaris compiler build rules to use the cpp preprocessor,
Previous Message Larry Rosenman 2006-04-28 16:09:40 Re: Logging pg_autovacuum