Re: PostgreSQL v7.1 Release Candidate 4

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL v7.1 Release Candidate 4
Date: 2001-04-13 16:36:58
Message-ID: 4452.987179818@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-announce pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Can you give me specific text? I though 7.1 was a little better about
> preserving the metadata.

Not in the least --- 7.1's CLUSTER is just as bad as ever.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-announce by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2001-04-14 05:30:55 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: PostgreSQL v7.1 Release Announcement
Previous Message Jeff Duffy 2001-04-12 20:17:23 DBD::Pg 0.96 Released

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin S. 2001-04-13 16:39:58 Shared memory failure?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-04-13 16:30:46 Re: updates way slower than selects?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-04-13 16:44:55 Re: timeout on lock feature
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-04-13 16:32:40 Re: Yellow Dog Linux/PPC regression