| From: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chris(dot)kings-lynne(at)calorieking(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>, Markus Schaber <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Pgsql performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Inserts optimization? |
| Date: | 2006-04-20 01:32:53 |
| Message-ID: | 4446E4C5.90400@paradise.net.nz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>> Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> writes:
>>> It's the refusal of people to stop using MyISAM table types that's the
>>> real issue.
>>
>> Isn't MyISAM still the default over there? It's hardly likely that the
>> average MySQL user would use anything but the default table type ...
>
> Since MySQL 5, InnoDB tables are default I recall.
Might be for the binaries from www.mysql.com - but if you build from
source, it still seems to be MYISAM (checked with 5.0.18 and 5.1.7 here).
Cheers
Mark
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Wu Fengguang | 2006-04-20 02:08:53 | Introducing a new linux readahead framework |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2006-04-20 01:07:30 | Re: Inserts optimization? |