| From: | Gábriel Ákos <akos(dot)gabriel(at)i-logic(dot)hu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Francisco Reyes <lists(at)stringsutils(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Inserts optimization? |
| Date: | 2006-04-15 08:35:41 |
| Message-ID: | 4440B05D.8070002@i-logic.hu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Michael Stone writes:
>
>> I still don't follow that. Why would the RAID level matter? IOW, are
>> you actually wanting 2 spares, or are you just stick with that because
>> you need a factor of two disks for your mirrors?
>
> RAID 10 needs pairs.. so we can either have no spares or 2 spares.
hm, interesting. I have recently set up a HP machine with smartarray 6i
controller, and it is able to handle 4 disks in raid10 plus 1 as spare.
with some scripting you can even use linux software raid in the same setup.
--
Üdvözlettel,
Gábriel Ákos
-=E-Mail :akos(dot)gabriel(at)i-logic(dot)hu|Web: http://www.i-logic.hu=-
-=Tel/fax:+3612367353 |Mobil:+36209278894 =-
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Francisco Reyes | 2006-04-15 13:16:15 | Re: Inserts optimization? |
| Previous Message | Gábriel Ákos | 2006-04-15 08:32:56 | Re: Inserts optimization? |