Re: notification information functions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: notification information functions
Date: 2008-05-19 13:52:45
Message-ID: 4440.1211205165@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net> writes:
> How will we know then that all listeners have received their events ?

We won't, but we don't know that now. In both the current
implementation and this proposed one, the most you can tell is whether a
backend has absorbed an event notification, not whether it has passed it
on to its client. ISTM the timing of the first event is an
implementation artifact and not interesting for users.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-05-19 14:10:38 Re: triggers on prepare, commit, rollback... ?
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2008-05-19 13:51:47 Re: WITH RECURSIVE patch V0.1