Re: bad performance on Solaris 10

From: Robert Lor <Robert(dot)Lor(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM>, Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Chris Mair <list(at)1006(dot)org>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: bad performance on Solaris 10
Date: 2006-04-13 17:40:08
Message-ID: 443E8CF8.2090108@sun.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


Bruce Momjian wrote On 04/13/06 01:39 AM,:
>
> Yes, if someone wants to give us a clear answer on which wal_sync method
> is best on all versions of Solaris, we can easily make that change.
>

We're doing tests to see how various parameters in postgresql.conf
affect performance on Solaris and will share the results shortly.

Regards,
-Robert

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2006-04-13 18:00:07 Blocks read for index scans
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-04-13 17:38:00 Re: pgmemcache