Re: plpgsql by default

From: Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, andrew(at)supernews(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: plpgsql by default
Date: 2006-04-11 22:17:34
Message-ID: 443C2AFE.3000301@tada.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> In the end it's only one small component of security, but any security
> expert will tell you that you take all the layers of security that you
> can get. If you don't need a given bit of functionality, it shouldn't
> get installed.
>
I think any security expert would say that if let non trustworthy people get so far as to
create their own SQL statements, you're in big trouble. Plpgsql or not. I fail to see what
the real issue is here. Your argument is analog to saying "don't install bash on a Linux
system by default. People might do bad things with it".

Regards,
Thomas Hallgren

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew - Supernews 2006-04-11 22:19:45 Re: plpgsql by default
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-04-11 22:15:33 Re: plpgsql by default