| From: | Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PL/Java Development <Pljava-dev(at)gborg(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Shared memory |
| Date: | 2006-03-27 16:27:09 |
| Message-ID: | 4428125D.7000707@tada.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pljava-dev |
Tom Lane wrote:
> It's only that much difference? Given all the other advantages of
> separating the JVM from the backends, I'd say you should gladly pay
> that price.
>
If I'm right, and the most common scenario is clients using connection pools, then it's very
likely that you don't get any advantages at all. Paying for nothing with a 440% increase in
calling time (at best) seems expensive :-)
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-27 16:32:28 | Re: Shared memory |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-27 15:31:47 | Re: Shared memory |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-27 16:32:28 | Re: Shared memory |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-27 15:31:47 | Re: Shared memory |