| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Joel Miller <joelwmiller(at)sbcglobal(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [SUGGESTION] CVSync |
| Date: | 2006-03-25 04:32:08 |
| Message-ID: | 4424C7C8.3060907@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
>
>>I agree that investigating alternatives would be a good idea: AFAIK
>>there's no easy way to build cvsup on Linux/AMD64 (without patches and
>>more pain than I'm willing to endure), so I use cvsup on one machine and
>>then periodically rsync a copy of that to my main (AMD64) machine.
>
>
> Actually, the last time I looked seriously at cvsup, my requirement was
> that it build on HPUX, which it did not (well, maybe it would've with
> sufficient investment of pain, but that wasn't happening). I was about
> to take another look at whether I couldn't just-install-it on FC4, but
> my main FC4 machine is now x86_64, so your remarks are discouraging me
> again :-(
FWIW I use the i386 FC4 RPMs on my x86_64 FC4 machine -- works fine.
Joe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-25 04:32:25 | Re: [SUGGESTION] CVSync |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-03-25 04:31:02 | Re: [SUGGESTION] CVSync |