Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables

From: Satoshi Nagayasu <nagayasus(at)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Akshat Nair <akshat(dot)nair(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Get explain output of postgresql in Tables
Date: 2006-03-23 22:54:09
Message-ID: 44232711.4000901@nttdata.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Structure for the human-consumable output or for something that would be
> machine-parsed? ISTM it would be best to keep the current output as-is,
> and provide some other means for producing machine-friendly output,
> presumably in a table format.

How about (well-formed) XML format?
Anyone menthioned in the past threads?

I guess XML is good for the explain structure.
--
NAGAYASU Satoshi <nagayasus(at)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-03-23 22:54:11 Role incompatibilities
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-03-23 22:50:34 Re: [SUGGESTION] CVSync