From: | Sven Geisler <sgeisler(at)aeccom(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL and Xeon MP |
Date: | 2006-03-16 15:20:31 |
Message-ID: | 4419823F.6060205@aeccom.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi Guillaume,
Guillaume Smet schrieb:
>
> The server is a dell 6650 from end of 2004 with 4 xeon mp 2.2 and 2MB
> cache per proc.
>
> Here are the information from Dell:
> 4x PROCESSOR, 80532, 2.2GHZ, 2MB cache, 400Mhz, SOCKET F
> 8x DUAL IN-LINE MEMORY MODULE, 512MB, 266MHz
>
....
>
>> You should provide details from the XEON DP?
>
> The only problem is that the Xeon DP is installed with a 2.6 kernel
> and a postgresql 8.1.3 (it is used to test the migration from 7.4 to
> 8.1.3). So it's very difficult to really compare the two behaviours.
>
> It's a Dell 2850 with:
> 2 x PROCESSOR, 80546K, 2.8G, 1MB cache, XEON NOCONA, 800MHz
> 4 x DUAL IN-LINE MEMORY MODULE, 1GB, 400MHz
>
Did you compare 7.4 on a 4-way with 8.1 on a 2-way?
How many queries and clients did you use to test the performance?
How much faster is the XEON DP?
I think, you can expect that your XEON DP is faster on a single query
because CPU and RAM are faster. The overall performance can be better on
your XEON DP if you only have a few clients.
I guess, the newer hardware and the newer PostgreSQL version cause the
better performance.
Regards
Sven.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-16 15:57:01 | Re: BETWEEN optimizer problems with single-value |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-16 15:20:09 | Re: PostgreSQL and Xeon MP |