Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 01:18:47PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well, we have to change the code somehow to make it usable in frontend
>> as well as backend. And we can *not* have it do exit(1) in libpq.
>> So the solution I chose was to make it act the same as if FormatMessage
>> were to fail. I don't find this behavior unreasonable: what is really
>> important is the original error code, not whether we were able to
>> pretty-print it. I think the ereport(FATAL) coding is a pretty darn
>> bad idea even in the backend.

> Ok. I won't fight hard on that. Why changing the error message from
> "could not load netmsg.dll" to "unrecognized winsock error" then? The
> original error string is much more verbose to grab the context.

As the code stands, what you'll get told about is the error code
returned by the failed LoadLibrary call; the original winsock error
code is reported nowhere. I think that's backwards.

We could possibly write something like

sprintf(wserrbuf, "winsock error %d (could not load netmsg.dll to translate: error code %lu)", err, GetLastError())));

but I'm unconvinced that that's useful.

regards, tom lane