Re: pg 7.4.x - pg_restore impossibly slow

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "patrick keshishian" <pkeshish(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg 7.4.x - pg_restore impossibly slow
Date: 2006-04-14 03:15:17
Message-ID: 4413.1144984517@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

"patrick keshishian" <pkeshish(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> With these settings and running:
> pg_restore -vaOd dbname dbname.DUMP

If you had mentioned you were using random nondefault switches, we'd
have told you not to. -a in particular is a horrid idea performancewise
--- a standard schema-plus-data restore goes way faster because it's
doing index builds and foreign key checks wholesale instead of
incrementally.

> Is this because the -c option drops all foreign keys and
> so the restore goes faster? Should this be the preferred,
> recommended and documented method to run pg_restore?

It is documented in recent versions of the documentation: see
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/populate.html
particularly the last section.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-04-14 05:59:23 Re: Inserts optimization?
Previous Message patrick keshishian 2006-04-14 01:26:00 Re: pg 7.4.x - pg_restore impossibly slow