| From: | Raphaël Enrici <blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 1.4.2? |
| Date: | 2006-03-06 08:18:58 |
| Message-ID: | 440BF072.1070005@club-internet.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Dave Page wrote:
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Raphaël Enrici [mailto:blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr]
>>Sent: 06 March 2006 08:08
>>To: Dave Page
>>Cc: Andreas Pflug; pgadmin-hackers
>>Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] 1.4.2?
>>
>>
>>>Mainly because it got overlooked (sorry). It won't go onto
>>
>>the stable branch anyway though - we never had a bug report
>>about it (just the patch),
>>
>>At least we got one bug report... see bug #341117 at debian.org [1] :)
>
>
> s/we/debian :-)
Debian -> community & I -> we ;)
>>>and I'm not prepared to modify that code with virtually
>>
>>zero field testing to 'fix' it in 1.4.x.
>>
>>I tested it myself ;) Just joking, I fully understand your position.
>>However, can you please consider adding it for next release?
>>I'll keep
>>trace of it separately in debian packages until it's included
>>upstream.
>
>
> Certainly. Of course, you are welcome to apply a platform specific mod to 1.4.2 for Debian only as it'll obviously work there. I'm more worried aboout breaking Solaris/FreeBSD etc.
mmmh take a look at the patch... Should be ok.
Maybe other maintainers could try it and report?
Regards,
Raph
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2006-03-06 08:26:50 | Re: 1.4.2? |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2006-03-06 08:15:36 | Re: 1.4.2? |