Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I'll be honest, I'm skeptical that we need another keyword that basically
> means “WHERE, but applied at a different point in the query processing”.
That was my reaction too. I'm especially skeptical that getting out
front of the SQL standards committee is a good thing to do. If and
when this shows up in the standard, then sure.
regards, tom lane