Re: SCRAM authentication, take three

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Aleksander Alekseev <a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SCRAM authentication, take three
Date: 2017-04-06 18:46:29
Message-ID: 43eb551d-dac1-ec16-b39b-c6d26bfd2693@iki.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 04/06/2017 08:36 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 02:36:13PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> I didn't include the last-minute changes to the way you specify this in
>> pg_hba.conf. So it's still just "scram". I agree in general that we should
>> think about how to extend that too, but I think the proposed syntax was
>> overly verbose for what we actually support right now. Let's discuss that as
>> a separate thread, as well.
>
> [Action required within three days. This is a generic notification.]
>
> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item.

I don't think we will come up with anything better than what we have
now, so I have removed this from the open items list.

- Heikki

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-04-06 18:56:12 Re: Fast Default WIP patch for discussion
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-04-06 18:43:56 Re: Logical Replication and Character encoding