Re: Reliability recommendations

From: Philippe Marzin <philippe(dot)marzin(at)free(dot)fr>
To:
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Reliability recommendations
Date: 2006-02-25 00:18:52
Message-ID: 43FFA26C.5020802@free.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Do you have a hw reference that runs that fast (5 x 30 = 150MB/s) ?

Luke Lonergan a écrit :
> Joshua,
>
> On 2/24/06 9:19 AM, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
>> This machine... if you run it in raid 5 will only get 7-9 megabytes a
>> second READ! performance. That is with 6 SCSI drives.
>> If you run it in RAID 10 you get a more reasonable 50-55 megabytes per
>> second.
>>
>> I don't have it sitting in front of me or I would give you an exact
>> model number.
>>
>> This machine also uses the serverworks chipset which is known to be a
>> catastrophe.
>>
>
> I'd be more shocked if this weren't also true of nearly all SCSI HW RAID
> adapters of this era. If you had ordered an HP DL380 server you'd get about
> the same performance.
>
> BTW - I don't think there's anything reasonable about 50-55 MB/s from 6
> disks, I'd put the minimum for this era machine at 5 x 30 = 150MB/s.
>
> - Luke
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
>
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Kirkwood 2006-02-25 00:29:55 Re: Reliability recommendations
Previous Message Luke Lonergan 2006-02-25 00:06:57 Re: Reliability recommendations