Re: WAL recovery

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: cgg007(at)yahoo(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>, Andy Shellam <andy(dot)shellam(at)mailnetwork(dot)co(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: WAL recovery
Date: 2006-02-22 20:09:11
Message-ID: 43FCC4E7.6080000@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

CG wrote:
> Andy,
>
> FWIW, I /think/ the replication scheme you are trying to carry out is
> implemented in Command Prompt's "Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator" product. From
> what I understand, their system will independently copy over and replay
> "TransactionLog" files (translate: WAL files?) on your slave databases in a
> continuous stream or in a batch.
This is almost true :). We don't use the WAL but other the other items
are correct.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake
> They describe a few other features in their
> product that might make the commercial option worthwhile to try.
>
> CG
>

--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message sandhya 2006-02-23 07:54:43 large object unlinking
Previous Message CG 2006-02-22 19:55:45 Re: WAL recovery