Re: Reliability recommendations

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Jeremy Haile <jhaile(at)fastmail(dot)fm>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Reliability recommendations
Date: 2006-02-15 18:05:05
Message-ID: 43F36D51.5090502@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Jeremy Haile wrote:
> We are a small company looking to put together the most cost effective
> solution for our production database environment. Currently in
> production Postgres 8.1 is running on this machine:
>
> Dell 2850
> 2 x 3.0 Ghz Xeon 800Mhz FSB 2MB Cache
> 4 GB DDR2 400 Mhz
> 2 x 73 GB 10K SCSI RAID 1 (for xlog and OS)
> 4 x 146 GB 10K SCSI RAID 10 (for postgres data)
> Perc4ei controller
>
> The above is a standard Dell box with nothing added or modified beyond
> the options available directly through Dell.
You should probably review the archives for PostgreSQL user
experience with Dell's before you purchase one.

> I sent our scenario to our sales team at Dell and they came back with
> all manner of SAN, DAS, and configuration costing as much as $50k.
>
HAHAHAHAHA.... Don't do that. Dell is making the assumption
you won't do your homework. Make sure you cross quote with IBM,
Compaq and Penguin Computing...

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2006-02-15 18:17:35 Re: Reliability recommendations
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2006-02-15 17:38:17 Re: out of memory