From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Query favourite comment |
Date: | 2006-02-13 14:18:27 |
Message-ID: | 43F09533.6050506@pse-consulting.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Dave Page wrote:
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net]
>>Sent: 13 February 2006 14:01
>>To: Dave Page; Andreas Pflug
>>Cc: pgadmin-hackers
>>Subject: RE: [pgadmin-hackers] Query favourite comment
>>
>>
>>>>After quite a while, I finally found the time to package a win32
>>>>snapshot. Some comments:
>>>>
>>>>1) apparently, we need two iconv dlls now: iconv.dll for xml2 and
>>>>libiconv-2.dll for libpq. Hm...
>>>
>>>I suspect we can get down to one by compiling libxml2
>>>ourselves, however that would probably make building pgAdmin
>>>far more difficult. Lesser of two evils 'n' all that...
>>
>>Can we link iconv statically? (That's what I did for my tests, that's
>>probably why I didn't notice it)
>
>
> LGPL...
So what? AFAICS we're complying with section 6 (a/d) of LPGL.
Anyhow, do we need to mention iconv/libxml somewhere in the docs?
Regards,
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2006-02-13 14:31:50 | Re: Query favourite comment |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2006-02-13 14:07:48 | Re: Query favourite comment |