Re: [PERFORM] What do the Windows pg hackers out there like

From: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] What do the Windows pg hackers out there like
Date: 2006-02-12 04:06:22
Message-ID: 43EEB43E.2090304@paradise.net.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Tom Lane wrote:
> Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> writes:
>
>>I was doing exactly this about a year ago and used Mingw. The only
>>annoyance was that I could compile everything on Linux in about 3
>>minutes (P4 2.8Ghz), but had to wait about 60-90 minutes for the same
>>thing on Windows 2003 Server! (also a P4 2.8Ghz...). So I used to build
>>a 'go for coffee' task into the build and test cycle.
>
>
> Youch! That seems unbelievably bad, even for Microsloth. Did you ever
> identify what was the bottleneck?
>

No - I was connecting using an RDB client from a Linux box (over a LAN),
so was never sure how much that was hurting things... but (as noted by
Magnus) the compiler itself is noticeablely slower (easily observed
during the 'configure' step).

cheers

Mark

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-02-12 04:44:53 Re: to_char and i18n
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-02-12 03:55:59 Re: TODO Item - Add system view to show free space map

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aaron Turner 2006-02-12 07:58:48 Re: 10+hrs vs 15min because of just one index
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-02-11 21:24:53 Re: 10+hrs vs 15min because of just one index