| From: | Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)it(dot)is(dot)rice(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Demo ideas? |
| Date: | 2006-02-05 01:25:39 |
| Message-ID: | 43E55413.70401@tada.se |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Ken,
There are alternatives. The most obvious is perhaps to use gcj and avoid the jvm dependency
altogether. Other alternatives are listed under the heading "zlib conflict" here:
http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/pljava/genpage.php?readme
Question: When is zlib used in the backend today?
Kind regards,
Thomas Hallgren
Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 12:29:39PM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Thomas,
>>
>>> And don't forget to mention
>>> PL/Java ;-)
>> You'll be happy to know that the analyst had a specific question about java
>> procedural support.
>>
>> BTW, what happened to the discussion of moving PL/java into core for 8.2?
>>
>> --
>> --Josh
>>
> Josh,
>
> We tried to include PL/java in our standard build, but the version of
> the zlib library in the JVM is ancient and the incompatibility would
> cause the DB to crash. Until we can get a JVM built against a current
> library from Sun I think it would be a bad idea to have PL/java in
> the core.
>
> Ken
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2006-02-05 11:32:45 | Re: Demo ideas? |
| Previous Message | Jeff Trout | 2006-02-03 14:33:42 | Re: Demo ideas? |