Re: No heap lookups on index

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: David Scott <davids(at)apptechsys(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: No heap lookups on index
Date: 2006-01-19 01:18:55
Message-ID: 43CEE8FF.3050308@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> Oracle does, but you pay in other ways. Instead of keeping dead tuples
> in the main heap, they shuffle them off to an 'undo log'. This has some
> downsides:
>
> Rollbacks take *forever*, though this usually isn't much of an issue
> unless you need to abort a really big transaction.

It's a good point though. Surely a database should be optimised for the
most common operation - commits, rather than rollbacks?

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-01-19 01:20:17 Re: No heap lookups on index
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-01-19 01:13:59 Re: No heap lookups on index

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-01-19 01:20:17 Re: No heap lookups on index
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-01-19 01:13:59 Re: No heap lookups on index