From: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Sun-Oracle lovefest: PostGreNeverMind |
Date: | 2006-01-18 18:40:57 |
Message-ID: | 43CE8BB9.9070000@cheapcomplexdevices.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
More cynically, what this means to me is that if I want
a closer relationship with Oracle I should announce
PostgreSQL support in my products.
I can imagine the conversation going like this:
Larry: Oooh, Linux has lots of buzz, let's use that.
Scott: Hey, Larry, I thought we were best buddies.
Larry: Yeah, but OS's are commodity '70s technology
and free implementations are just about as good
as the expensive ones - so we don't need you.
Scott: Hmm aren't databases are commodity '70s
technology too?
Sun Eng: Yes, Scott; and PostgreSQL is just about
as good as the expensive ones.
Scott: Hey Larry, guess what I found!!!
Larry: Scott, we miss you, please come back.
But the good news is that even if their PostgreSQL
work was in part a message to Oracle that Sun has
competitive alternatives at least for some
applications - the good news is that PostgreSQL is
indeed such a competitive alternative.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-01-18 23:27:01 | Re: Case studies (was: [PERFORM] big databases & |
Previous Message | Tomka Gergely | 2006-01-18 07:41:09 | Re: Case studies (was: [PERFORM] big databases & |