Re: Sun-Oracle lovefest: PostGreNeverMind

From: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
To: Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Sun-Oracle lovefest: PostGreNeverMind
Date: 2006-01-18 18:40:57
Message-ID: 43CE8BB9.9070000@cheapcomplexdevices.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


More cynically, what this means to me is that if I want
a closer relationship with Oracle I should announce
PostgreSQL support in my products.

I can imagine the conversation going like this:

Larry: Oooh, Linux has lots of buzz, let's use that.
Scott: Hey, Larry, I thought we were best buddies.
Larry: Yeah, but OS's are commodity '70s technology
and free implementations are just about as good
as the expensive ones - so we don't need you.
Scott: Hmm aren't databases are commodity '70s
technology too?
Sun Eng: Yes, Scott; and PostgreSQL is just about
as good as the expensive ones.
Scott: Hey Larry, guess what I found!!!
Larry: Scott, we miss you, please come back.

But the good news is that even if their PostgreSQL
work was in part a message to Oracle that Sun has
competitive alternatives at least for some
applications - the good news is that PostgreSQL is
indeed such a competitive alternative.

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-01-18 23:27:01 Re: Case studies (was: [PERFORM] big databases &
Previous Message Tomka Gergely 2006-01-18 07:41:09 Re: Case studies (was: [PERFORM] big databases &