Re: Access bool integer solution

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: Sim Zacks <sim(at)compulab(dot)co(dot)il>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Access bool integer solution
Date: 2005-12-19 09:14:11
Message-ID: 43A679E3.2030703@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Sim Zacks wrote:
> I've been having problems with bools in my Access frontend and
> PostGreSQL backend. The problem is that Access uses -1 for true and 0
> for false and when it does a select it uses those numbers instead of the
> true or false values. PostGreSQL does not have an implicit conversion
> from int to bool, so it was failing was with an error "Operator does not
> exist: boolean=integer"
> I got around this in my queries by using the cbool function, which
> passed in the actual true or false values. This solution did not work
> for internal filters, because it internally calls the select statement
> and does not give an interface to the code.

Are you sure there isn't a setting in the ODBC driver to handle this?

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tino Wildenhain 2005-12-19 09:18:26 Re: sequences w/o holes
Previous Message Tino Wildenhain 2005-12-19 07:50:48 Re: sequences in transaction blocks