Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Schema bug

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Guillaume LELARGE <guillaume(dot)lelarge(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Schema bug
Date: 2005-12-14 17:14:20
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
Dave Page wrote:

>>I'm still not convinced we need to do anything. Renaming public is 
>>highly irregular, and finally showing system objects will make it 
>>reappear. The schema restriction allows individual filters 
>>who likes it.
> Renaming public is irregular, but if we can allow it without breaking
> anything else, then I see no reason why we shouldn't do it.

So for god's sake do implement it, but in general I'm less than inclined 
to implement workarounds for people doing weird things to the db. I'm 
waiting for the guy who claims that his "was-public" schema suddenly 
reapperars in pgadmin, while he just renamed it to have it hidden from 
the users.... There *are* admins that deliberately rename pg objects to 
hide them from pgadmin's sight.


In response to


pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Jerry LeVanDate: 2005-12-14 19:05:30
Subject: PgAdmin3 1.4.1 on Mac OSX 1.4.1 is unusable....
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2005-12-14 12:59:03
Subject: Re: Schema bug

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group