| From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Guillaume LELARGE <guillaume(dot)lelarge(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Schema bug |
| Date: | 2005-12-13 04:58:55 |
| Message-ID: | 439E550F.40407@pse-consulting.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 12:48:55AM +0100, Guillaume LELARGE wrote:
>
>>Well, it seems that pg_* schemas are system schemas and that public and
>>information_schema schemas are public one. I think we should exclude system
>>schemas depending on their names and show public and information_schema,
>>whatever their actual name are.
>
>
> BTW, it'd probably be useful to have an easy way to show everything.
> It's not that uncommon to want to go into the catalog tables...
This option is called "system objects" and is present in pgadmin since
the very beginning...
Regards,
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guillaume LELARGE | 2005-12-13 07:09:37 | Re: Schema bug |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-12-13 00:20:09 | Re: Schema bug |