Re: anniversary

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: anniversary
Date: 2005-12-08 18:07:22
Message-ID: 4398765A.8040508@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Neil,

> For curiosity's sake, were there a small number of total responses to
> the survey, or did most of the respondents indicate that they wouldn't
> be likely to attend?
>
> (If the first, it might just be that not very many people saw the survey
> or bothered to fill it out...)

Just not many responses. Pretty much people only filled it out if they
wanted to attend.

> I've volunteered to help organize in the past, so do let me know if I
> can be of any help.

OK. As soon as we book the space, we'll be expanding the conference
committee (and probably starting a project around it).

> One idea that comes to mind is having the anniversary as a
> "mini-conference" associated with a conference that a lot of Postgres
> folks will be attending anyway -- for example, OSCON '06 is only two
> weeks after the "official" anniversary date.

Craparoonie, I hadn't realize that OSCON was early this year. I don't
think we can afford to piggyback it on OSCON, which is very expensive
(like, $10,000 per day). Unlike Toronto, summer is high tourist season
in Portland and there simply aren't inexpensive spaces.

--Josh

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2005-12-08 18:17:14 Re: anniversary
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2005-12-08 17:54:49 Re: announcing the postgres 10th anniversary