Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1
Date: 2005-12-03 06:10:22
Message-ID: 439136CE.70509@rhyme.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>It's something that's on the ever-growing TODO list ... I dunno if
>anyone has any near-term plans to work on it. It'd definitely be
>nice to teach the planner to do joins-over-unions well, and then
>make inheritance just invoke that behavior instead of being a crocky
>special case.
>
>
Sounds good; currently if you use the polymorphism of inherited tables,
and happen to cross 2 such tables, you get O(n^2) performance.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2005-12-03 08:56:41 Re: Spam 508
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-03 04:25:23 Re: Numeric 508 datatype