Re: was a initdb required from 8.1beta3 -> beta4?

From:	Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>
To:	jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:	Re: was a initdb required from 8.1beta3 -> beta4?
Date:	2005-12-02 21:43:57
Message-ID:	4390C01D.6030908@amsoftwaredesign.com
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2005-12-02 22:03:27 from Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>  2005-12-02 22:08:43 from "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>   2005-12-02 21:43:57 from Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>    2005-12-03 03:49:57 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>     2005-12-02 22:18:53 from Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>
Lists:	pgsql-general

In response to

• Re: was a initdb required from 8.1beta3 -> beta4? at 2005-12-02 22:08:43 from Joshua D. Drake

Responses

• Re: was a initdb required from 8.1beta3 -> beta4? at 2005-12-03 03:49:57 from Tom Lane

Browse pgsql-general by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Karl O. Pinc	2005-12-02 21:48:09	New.* and old.* as function arguments within rules
Previous Message	Tom Lane	2005-12-02 21:30:54	Re: Numeric 508 datatype