Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions
Date: 2005-12-02 01:45:13
Message-ID: 438FA729.4070602@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

> BTW, has anyone checked Command Prompt's Subversion repository? It's a
> mirror of our anonymous CVS (AFAICT). I'm using it for reading diffs
> lately, and it's much nicer to look at the whole patch as a single diff
> rather than going a single file at a time.
>
> http://projects.commandprompt.com/projects/public/pgsql/browser/trunk/pgsql
>
> It has the additional advantage over our current CVSweb that it's set
> with tabs to 4 spaces, so it looks just like our code is supposed to ...

Does anyone else find the PostgreSQL "TRUNK" funny? :D

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-02 02:44:32 Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Previous Message Qingqing Zhou 2005-12-02 01:07:13 Re: Fork-based version of pgbench