Re: SQLJ, any plans?

From: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>
To: Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SQLJ, any plans?
Date: 2005-11-26 12:19:23
Message-ID: 438852CB.3080701@opencloud.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On 11/25/05, Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>Jaime Casanova wrote:
>>
>>>are there any plans to get embedded SQL (SQLJ) to work with the jdbc
>>>in postgres?
>>
>>What fails with the current driver?
>>
>
> The driver works fine, AFAIK... but it can use the SQLJ syntax?

Uh.. from my limited knowledge of SQLJ, isn't it like "embedded SQL" in
the C world? i.e. you have a translator (the equivalent to ecpg) that
takes annotated source with SQLJ syntax and turns it into a regular Java
source file that uses standard JDBC? So the driver itself never sees the
SQLJ syntax..

Sounds like what you are looking for is a SQLJ translator? I don't know
of any plans to write a postgresql-specific translator .. aren't there
generic ones available, since the DB-level interface (JDBC) is standardized?

-O

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Jowett 2005-11-26 23:08:01 [Fwd: I found a bug in postgresql8.0.3]
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2005-11-26 05:52:22 Re: SQLJ, any plans?