Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Numeric 508 datatype

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Date: 2005-11-20 20:30:15
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackerspgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian wrote:

>Let's go ahead and apply the patch.  While this change isn't very
>significant, I bet there will be other changes in 8.2 where we will want
>to change the database for a significant benefit, like reducing the
>tuple header by 4 bytes by recompressing the four xid/cid fields back
>into three.

All of which makes me very uncomfortable about doing 64 bit enums. I am 
still trying to think of a better solution.



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2005-11-20 20:31:05
Subject: Re: Materialized views (Was Re: Improving count(*))
Previous:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2005-11-20 20:06:10
Subject: Re: Returning multiple result sets

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2005-11-21 07:32:35
Subject: In pg_dump "no owner" mode don't dump owner names in comments
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-11-20 17:43:42
Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: BenDate: 2005-11-20 21:37:17
Subject: Re: to create a database...
Previous:From: P.MDate: 2005-11-20 19:34:09
Subject: to create a database...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group