Re: Multi-table-unique-constraint

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Matt Newell <newellm(at)blur(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Multi-table-unique-constraint
Date: 2005-11-13 16:12:19
Message-ID: 437765E3.10808@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:

>Matt Newell <newellm(at)blur(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>>BTW, i'm on the list now, so no need to cc me.
>>
>>
>
>Common practice around here is to cc people anyway --- this has grown
>out of a history of occasionally-slow list mail delivery. If you don't
>want it, best to fix it in your mail filters rather than expecting
>people to change habits for you.
>
>
>
>

You can also change your subscriptions so that you don't get a copy from
the list if you are in the To: or Cc: lists. I find this is better then
having to set up filters. Visit
http://mail.postgresql.org/mj/mj_wwwusr/domain=postgresql.org

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-11-13 16:31:38 Re: Supporting NULL elements in arrays
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-11-13 16:04:55 Re: prepareThreshold=1 and statement.executeBatch() ??

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-11-14 14:25:49 drop if exists
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-11-13 15:28:28 Re: Multi-table-unique-constraint