| From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom(dot)Zschockelt(at)flender(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: group role membership |
| Date: | 2005-11-10 15:04:19 |
| Message-ID: | 43736173.5070000@pse-consulting.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-support |
Tom(dot)Zschockelt(at)flender(dot)com wrote:
>>This is possible for <=8.0 groups, and it's a common task to assign a
>>bunch of users to a new group/role, so I'm inclined not to agree.
>
>
> I don't understand this comment.
> Do you mean that you disagree in my appreciation that modifying the
> underlying data will not
> be a high priority aspect or did you disagree with my proposal with the
> treectrl ?
I *do* want the "add roles to this role" feature, I'm not sure if this
is viable with a treeCtrl (though desirable).
>>>(An other solution could be a simple reporting solution to get a list
>
> of
>
>>>people who have access to a certain object.)
>
>
>>An additional "who has which rights on this object" dialog from context
>>menu?
>
>
> yes ( as an additional feature it will be very helpful )
Let's see when I find some time (or somebody else, hint-hint-hint!)
Regards,
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-11-11 10:11:40 | Re: Hide databases |
| Previous Message | Tom.Zschockelt | 2005-11-10 14:59:03 | Re: group role membership |