Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems

From: Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems
Date: 2005-11-08 21:13:17
Message-ID: 437114ED.1040603@gmx.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>
>>Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at> writes:
>>
>>>I am definatly not going to use -march=pentium4 in any production
>>>system. Should I open a bug report with RedHat (gcc vendor)?
>
>
>>Yeah, but they'll probably want a smaller test case than "Postgres fails
>>its regression tests" :-(
>
>
> I have just confirmed that the problem still exists in FC4's current
> compiler (gcc 4.0.1, gcc-4.0.1-4.fc4), which probably will boost up the
> priority of the complaint quite a long way in Red Hat's eyes.
>
> I've also confirmed that the problem is in interval_div; you can
> reproduce the failure with
>
> select '41 years 1 mon 11 days'::interval / 10;
[snip]

Would you mind reporting this to RedHat Bugzilla? I believe a bug report
from you would have more weight then mine, because you actually
understand what's going on here. :-)

Otherwise I am going to do do my best...

Best Regards,
Michael Paesold

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-11-08 21:14:34 Re: Exclusive lock for database rename
Previous Message Robert Creager 2005-11-08 21:09:35 Re: Assert failure found in 8.1RC1

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-11-08 22:48:16 Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems
Previous Message Michael Paesold 2005-11-08 21:07:35 Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems