From: | thomas at tada(dot)se (Thomas Hallgren) |
---|---|
To: | |
Subject: | R: Re: [Pljava-dev] crash due to huge load? |
Date: | 2005-10-29 08:35:54 |
Message-ID: | 4363346A.4000503@tada.se |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pljava-dev |
rcolmegna at tiscali.it wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> thanks for your reply. Sorry but I would disagree with your hipotesys
> about Log4J: I have used it without any problem (in PLJava Trigger).
>
> The evidence is the fact that if I use my PLJ/Trigger a lot of time (the
> same .SQL
> script execute, via PSQL, 20 times), without complex-thread behaviour, the
>
> Log4J logs are correctly produced.
>
>
Yes of course log4j will produce output. That's not what I meant. What I
mean is that:
- the java.util.logging package is well integrated with the PostgreSQL
backend and you can control it using the log_min_messages,
client_min_messages etc. in the postgresql.conf.
- the output will not conflict with the output from the PostgreSQL
logger since one uses the other.
- by setting client_min_messages, you can actually propagate logging to
the client.
- the java.util.logging does pretty much the same tasks as the log4j
logger so you have a lot of redundant code in your backend for no
apparent reason.
- if you want log4j to output to a file, you must use the untrusted
language handler, the trusted handler will not allow log4j to open a file.
> But if I enable complex-thread behaviour the pgsrv crash at the
> second psql-session execution.
>
>
Again, please send the backend log. If you don't want to disclose the
content on this mailing list, send it to me directly.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | rcolmegna at tiscali.it | 2005-10-29 08:43:29 | R: Re: [Pljava-dev] crash due to huge load? |
Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2005-10-29 08:26:39 | [Pljava-dev] crash due to huge load? |