Re: problems after pg_resetxlog

Miguel wrote:

> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Increasing the WAL start address might help (see the pg_resetxlog man
>> page). Realize that you're probably going to be dealing with corrupted
>> data, however :-(
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>>
>>
Ops, foget the last email, i reread the man, this is what i have to do:

shiva2 pg_xlog # ls -l
total 180448
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Oct 28 18:05
00000001000000980000001A
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Oct 28 18:07
00000001000000980000001B
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Oct 28 18:10
00000001000000980000001C
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Oct 28 18:10
00000001000000980000001D
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Oct 28 17:25
00000001000000980000001E
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Oct 28 17:28
00000001000000980000001F
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Oct 28 17:37
000000010000009800000020
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Oct 28 17:51
000000010000009800000021
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Oct 28 17:53
000000010000009800000022
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Oct 28 17:46
000000010000009800000023
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Oct 28 17:49
000000010000009800000024
drwx------ 2 postgres postgres 4096 Apr 22 2005 archive_status

So :

pg_resetxlog -l 0x01, 0x98, 0x25 dir_data

Is this ok?