Re: Reindex - Is this necessary after a vacuum?

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: markus(at)m-bass(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Reindex - Is this necessary after a vacuum?
Date: 2005-10-25 14:16:27
Message-ID: 435E3E3B.1000805@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Markus Benne wrote:
> We are reindexing frequently, and I'm wondering if
> this is really necessary, given that it appears to
> take an exclusive lock on the table.
>
> Our table in question is vacuumed every 4 minutes, and
> we are reindexing after each one.
>
> I'm not a fan of locking this table that frequently,
> even if it is only for 5 - 10 seconds depending on
> load.
>
> The vacuum is a standard vacuum. Nightly we do a
> vacuum analyze.

At most I'd do a nightly reindex. And in fact, I'd probably drop the
index, full vacuum, recreate index.

But you only need to reindex at all if you have a specific problem with
the index bloating. Are you seeing this?

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-10-25 14:23:20 Re: insertion of bytea
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-10-25 14:12:02 Re: Outer join query plans and performance