Re: support for MERGE

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: support for MERGE
Date: 2021-03-19 14:09:45
Message-ID: 435676bb-078c-08b3-312c-cf53f4bb33a9@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/18/21 11:48 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2021-Jan-18, Robert Haas wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 8:48 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>>> Here's a rebase of Simon/Pavan's MERGE patch to current sources. I
>>> cleaned up some minor things in it, but aside from rebasing, it's pretty
>>> much their work (even the commit message is Simon's).
>>
>> It's my impression that the previous discussion concluded that their
>> version needed pretty substantial design changes. Is there a plan to
>> work on that? Or was some of that stuff done already?
>
> I think some of the issues were handled as I adapted the patch to
> current sources. However, the extensive refactoring that had been
> recommended in the old threads has not been done. I have these two
> comments mainly:
>
> https://postgr.es/m/CABOikdOeraX0RKojBs0jZxY5SmbQF3GJBP0+Rat=2g+VQsA+9g@mail.gmail.com
> https://postgr.es/m/7168.1547584387@sss.pgh.pa.us
>
> I'll try to get to those, but I have some other patches that I need to
> handle first.

Since it does not appear this is being worked on for PG14 perhaps we
should close it in this CF and then reopen it when a patch is available?

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2021-03-19 14:11:03 Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods
Previous Message Андрей Зубков 2021-03-19 14:08:45 [PATCH] pg_stat_statements dealloc field ignores manual deallocation